by: Molly Lupo, APRN
Body composition has gained significant attention as individuals increasingly prioritize understanding their body fat percentages and lean muscle mass, moving beyond traditional reliance on BMI alone.
There are several methods available to measure body composition. Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are considered the most accurate method of quantifying body composition and offer detailed cross-sectional images that provide precise data at the tissue and organ level. While both methods are highly accurate, CT involves exposure to low-dose radiation (higher than Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)). MRI, using radio frequency signals, requires patients to lie still for extended periods, which can be challenging for some individuals. Additionally, access to specialized machines and software, along with costs (ranging between $500-$1,000 per scan for CT), can be limiting factors.
DXA is a method that utilizes a low dose of radiation to measure fat-free mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content. Its benefits include high reliability with minimal effort required from the patient, making it a convenient option for accurate body composition assessment. The cost of DXA analysis typically ranges between $100 and $300 per session.
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) utilizes a low-level electrical current to measure body impedance, which varies based on water and fat tissue. BIA's accuracy is influenced by hydration levels, necessitating consistent conditions (such as conducting the test first thing in the morning while fasting) for precise measurements. Despite cost variations, BIA is generally more affordable than DXA, CT, or MRI, averaging between $20-$100 per analysis.
These methods, alongside alternatives like Near-infrared Interactance, BOD POD, and skinfold measurements, offer diverse options for assessing body composition, each with unique benefits regarding accuracy, cost, and patient comfort.
In the context of weight loss efforts, individuals often experience reductions in both lean muscle mass and fat mass. Achieving fat loss while preserving lean muscle mass requires specific measures, including adequate protein intake and engagement in progressive overload strength training.
Protein intake supports lean muscle maintenance during fat loss phases, with a guideline recommending 0.7-1.0grams of protein per pound of body weight. In cases where someone is trying to lose more than 20-30 pounds, calculating protein needs based on their ideal (or adjusted body weight) rather than their current weight may be more appropriate. For example, someone aiming to reduce from 230 to 180 pounds might start with a protein goal of 126 grams per day (180 pounds × 0.7 grams).
Educating patients on portion sizes relative to protein content helps them plan effectively. A meal providing approximately ~ 40 grams of protein could include 2 eggs (12 grams), 1 cup of plain nonfat Greek yogurt (20 grams), and a quarter cup of sliced almonds (6 grams), supplemented with fruits and vegetables for added nutrients and fiber.
In addition to nutrition, implementing a strength-based training program at least three times weekly is recommended, incorporating progressive overload to stimulate muscle growth. Collaboration with a physical therapist or fitness professional ensures proper technique and minimizes injury risks.
The frequency of body composition testing should be individualized based on the person, intervention (e.g., strength training, nutrition), and goals, typically occurring as a baseline before interventions, 5-10% total weight loss, and/or every 6-12 weeks to monitor changes.
By emphasizing these strategies, healthcare clinicians can effectively support patients in achieving fat loss goals while preserving lean muscle mass, promoting overall health and well-being.
Reference: Holmes CJ, Racette SB. The Utility of Body Composition Assessment in Nutrition and Clinical Practice: An Overview of Current Methodology. Nutrients. 2021 Jul 22;13(8):2493. doi: 10.3390/nu13082493. PMID: 34444653; PMCID: PMC8399582.
Comments